SENSE

Survey of Entering Student Engagment Initiative

The SENSE instrument, developed by the Community College Leadership Program at The University of Texas at Austin, is administered during the fourth and fifth weeks of the fall semester in randomly selected classes consisting of first-college-level English and math courses and developmental education courses (excluding ESOL courses).  Dual credit high school and distance learning classes were excluded from the sample.  Table A compares the demographic breakdown of the SENSE respondents to Richland’s fall 2007 credit demographics and to the 2007 SENSE cohort colleges.

Gender

Richland
Entering Respondents

N=394

Richland Returning Respondents
N=337

Richland Student Body
N=15,731

SENSE Cohort Colleges Population
N=13,233

Male

45%

43%

44%

40%

Female

55%

57%

56%

60%

Race or Ethnicity

 

 

 

 

Native American

1%

1%

0%

0%

Asian

8%

10%

13%

5%

African American

18%

20%

19%

16%

Anglo

34%

27%

40%

42%

Hispanic, Latino

24%

23%

20%

30%

Other

3%

6%

5%

3%

International Student

12%

14%

2%

4%

Age

 

 

 

 

18 to 19

69%

24%

16%

21%

20 to 21

10%

23%

20%

20%

22 to 24

6%

18%

19%

17%

25 to 29

7%

19%

16%

15%

30 to 39

5%

11%

15%

15%

40 to 49

2%

5%

7%

8%

50 to 64

0%

1%

4%

3%

65 and over

0%

0%

4%

1%

Enrollment Status

 

 

 

 

Part-Time

40%

51%

69%

66%

Full-Time

60%

49%

31%

34%

Table A

The demographics for Richland’s entering respondents demonstrated an under-representation of Asian and Anglo students and an over-representation of international students compared Richland’s fall 2007 student population.  Due to the SENSE’s course-based sampling method, full-time students were over-represented in the entering respondent group (60%) versus the overall Richland population (31%). Comparing Richland’s entering respondents to the SENSE cohort shows that Richland had fewer Anglo and Hispanic students and more international students.  The greater representation of Hispanics in the SENSE cohort can be attributed to the number of Texas colleges that participated in the pilot.  Younger students, age 18 to 19 years old, comprised the great majority of Richland’s entering respondents (69%).  Following are successes and opportunities for improvement from the 2007 SENSE results.  Additional details can be found in Attachment I and are organized to mirror the path students take as they enter college: first impressions, entry processes, orientation and student success courses, and classroom experiences and academic support.

Successes:

Of Richland’s entering respondents:

  • 82.8% strongly agreed or agreed with the statement, “I was able to access the information I needed to complete the enrollment process (admissions, registration, financial aid, etc.)”
  • 70.0% strongly agreed with the statement, “ I have the motivation to do what it takes to succeed in college
  • 68.6% used academic advising/planning at least once, with 25.9% stating they used it “at least weekly”.
  • 53.0% stated they took part in an online orientation prior to the beginning of classes.
  • Of those who had participated in a student success/student development/student life skills course, 31.5% said the course very much helped them gain knowledge and skills important to success as a college student.
  • 80.6% indicated they worked with other students on a project during class in their first three weeks of their first academic term.
  • 72.0% agreed that instructors had activities to introduce students to one another.

 

Opportunities for Improvement:

Of Richland’s entering respondents:

  • Only 63.1% said they felt welcome the very first time they came to Richland, with only 19.0% strongly agreeing and 33.3% neutral.
  • 5.8% listed an academic advisor (non-faculty) as their primary source of academic advising (academic planning and course recommendations) during the first three weeks of their first academic term, while 35.8% used friends, family or other students.
  • 31.4% disagreed with the statement, “An advisor helped me to set academic goals and to create a plan for achieving them.”
  • 78.4% did not have a specific person assigned to them so they could see him/her each time they needed information or assistance.
  • 79% indicated their placement scores placed them into developmental/college Prep math, 40.5% into developmental reading, and 37.0% into developmental writing, highlighting the importance of having academic advising and planning.
  • Only about half (48.1%) indicated they were informed that they could apply for financial aid.
  • Only 16.5% agreed with the statement, “A financial aid staff member helped me analyze my needs for financial aid.”
  • When asked how often they use financial aid advising, 61.1% answered not at all.
  • Only 11.4% attended an on-campus orientation program prior to the beginning of classes, but this can be attributed to Richland opting for an online format.
  • 95.4% said they did not enroll in an orientation course as part of their course schedule during their first academic term.
  • When asked if they were aware of a college orientation program course, only 25.9% answered affirmatively.

Richland College also participated in the national field test involving 109 colleges in fall 2008. Benchmark data will be available on the college web site mid-spring 2009.  

The link to the student surveys page is http://intranet.dcccd.edu/intranet/dcccd/rlc/student/ . For additional information contact Bao Huynh at BHuynh@dcccd.edu.


Additional General Information About the Survey


As community and technical colleges focus on improving student outcomes, they need a way to systematically understand the earliest experiences of their students. CCSSE’s Survey of Entering Student Engagement (SENSE) provides this information. Developed by national experts in the field of community and technical college research and practice, SENSE is designed to provide a clear picture of both student behaviors in the earliest weeks of college and the institutional practices that affect students during this critical time. SENSE is a research-based tool with multiple uses:
  Diagnosis — identifying the areas in which entering students are thriving and those in which they are struggling, so colleges can target improvement efforts.
  Benchmarking — examining college results in light of national benchmarks for effective educational practice with entering students.
  Monitoring — documenting and improving institutional effectiveness over time and helping colleges examine the impact of interventions aimed at improving students' earliest collegiate experiences.
  Accountability — demonstrating institutional results and progress in supporting entering students. Institutions may choose to use SENSE data to respond to accrediting agencies’ calls for institutional self-study and quality improvement strategies.


 Survey Instrument
The SENSE survey includes items eliciting information from students about their first impressions of the college; intake processes such as admissions, registration, assessment, placement, orientation and financial aid; how they spend their time as they begin college; how they assess their earliest relationships and interactions with instructors, advisors, and other students; what kinds of work they are challenged to do; how the college supports their learning in the first few weeks; and so on.
In addition to the core SENSE survey, member colleges can elect to add up to two sets of special focus items (10-12 items per set). For the fall 2008 field test, three sets of special focus are available.

  • Student Motivation, Commitment and Support
  • Student experiences with Student Success Courses/Programs
  • Student experiences with Financial Assistance

A databank of special focus item modules will be available to SENSE member colleges focused on a variety of topics beginning with the first national administration in fall 2009.

 

Copyright © 2009 Richland College | DCCCD | Last Updated: